THINNING AND PRESCRIBED FIRE CAN MIMIC THE EFFECTS OF NATURAL WILDFIRES
(DNR 20-year Forest Health Strategic Plan, p. 41; emphasis added)
Forest management “mimics” natural wildfires? This may be a poor choice of words. Is August smoke over Seattle the only difference between wildfire and forest management?
And what happens when we make wildfire control our only criterion of forest health? This is where professional foresters get prickly. They are pressured by unhappy patients filling emergency rooms with respiratory problems. Families keeping their kids indoors when the smoke arrives are irritated. Tourist operators shut up shop and their clients blame DNR, climate change, Forest Service, and Government, in some order.
Fire control is one objective of forest management, but not the only one. We manage forests for timber production, recreation and viewscapes, wildlife habitat, surface water quality, carbon sequestration, and spiritual refreshment. And we ask our foresters to juggle these objectives on an eighty-year cycle (in eastern Washington). Foresters need to anticipate four (human) generations out the effects of what they do today.
No one management regime can maximize these often-conflicting objectives across all acres of treatment. We make choices of what and where.
Derek Churchill of DNR will lay out some of the nuances of planning for Washington’s forests. And he will touch on techniques as well.
Link to a very short DNR video to see manual thinning as well as comparative images of a healthy forest. Link then to a video of mechanical thinning, called masticating, just for fun.
Join Derek and George Wuerthner in a discussion of what we should expect from active forest management.
Don
Topic: Forest Thinning and Wildfire Behavior
Time: Mar 25, 2021 06:30 PM Pacific Time (US and Canada)
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87353896729?pwd=dFpxb2dqVTlKNEFyVGdkTjZ0NjNtUT09